Target Choice

The influence of different IS on genome architecture will depend not only on their levels of activity but also on the type of target into which they insert. It was initially believed that TE show no or only low sequence specificity in their target choice. For example IS630 and the eukaryotic Tc/mariner families (Tellier, et al., 2015) both require a TA dinucleotide in the target (Plasterk, 1996, Feng & Colloms, 2007) while others such as the IS200/IS605 and IS91 families require short tetra- or penta-nucleotide sequences (Mendiola & de la Cruz, 1989, Guynet, et al., 2009). Yet others, such as IS1 and IS186 (of the IS4 family), show some regional , et al., 1980, Meyer, et al., 1980, Sengstag, et al., 1986).

Although, from a global genome perspective, insertion may appear to occur without significant sequence specificity, accumulation of more statistically robust data has uncovered rather subtler insertion patterns revealing that several TE use rather shrewd mechanisms in choosing a target. For example, there is some indication from the public databases suggesting that IS density is generally significantly higher in conjugative bacterial plasmids than in their host chromosomes with the exception of special cases in which the host has undergone IS expansion. Such plasmids are major vectors in lateral gene transfer and are important vectors in IS transmission (as well as in transmission of accessory traits such as resistance to antibacterials). Some TE, including IS, appear to be attracted to replication forks (Peters & Craig, 2001, Ton-Hoang, et al., 2010) and show a strong orientation bias indicating strand preference at the fork (Hu & Derbyshire, 1998, Peters & Craig, 2001, Ton-Hoang, et al., 2010). Moreover, in certain cases, insertion may target stalled replication forks (He, et al., 2015). A link between replication (in this case, replication origins) Drosophila(Spradling, et al., 2011).

For example, transposon Tn7 has two modes of transposition: in one, which uses the Tn7-encoded target protein TnsD, a specific sequence within the highly conserved glmS is recognized and insertion occurs next to this essential gene (Craig, 2002); in the second, which uses a more general targeting protein, TnsE, insertion occurs into replication forks directed by interactions with the b-clamp (Parks, et al., 2009). This latter pathway results in a strong orientation bias of Tn7 insertions, consistent with insertion into the lagging strand of the replication fork formed during conjugative transfer. Although studies with IS are less advanced, a similar orientation bias was observed with IS903 (Hu & Derbyshire, 1998), suggesting that it too may use the b-clamp in directing insertions. It seems probable that many other IS use this type of protein-protein interaction.

A second example of specialized target choice was observed in members of the IS200/IS605 family. These transpose using a strand-specific single strand intermediate and insertion occurs 3' to a tetra- or penta-nucleotide on the lagging strand (Ton-Hoang, et al., 2010, He, et al., 2015). Clear vestiges of this specificity can still be detected in a large number of bacterial genomes where the orientation of insertion is strongly correlated with the direction of replication. There are clearly incidences of insertion in the "wrong" orientation but many of these may be explained by post insertion genome rearrangements involving inversions. This would place the "active" strand of the IS on the lagging rather than on the leading strand. Interestingly, those IS which are not oriented in the "correct" orientation with respect to replication are almost certainly inactive and unable to transpose further (Ton-Hoang, et al., 2010).

Other examples of sequence-specific target choice have been described. IS1, for example, shows a preference for regions rich in AT whereas the transposon TnGBS (an ICE from Steptococcus agalactiae) and members of the closely related ISLre2 family show a preference for insertion 15-17 bp upstream of σA promoters (Brochet, et al., 2009, Guerillot, et al., 2013). Targeting of upstream regions of transcription units has also been extensively documented for certain eukaryotic transposons (e.g.(Qi, et al., 2012)).

Potential topological characteristics or secondary structures are another feature which can attract certain TE. Changes in topology induced by the nucleoid protein, H-NS, for example, may explain the effects of H-NS mutants on the target choice of IS903 and Tn10 (IS10) (Swingle, et al., 2004, Haniford & Ellis, 2015). Members of the IS110, IS3 and IS4 families are examples of IS which insert into potential secondary structures such as Repeated Extragenic Palindromes (REP)(Clement, et al., 1999, Wilde, et al., 2003, Tobes & Pareja, 2006, He, et al., 2015), integrons (Tetu & Holmes, 2008, Post & Hall, 2009) or even the ends , et al., 1991, Partridge & Hall, 2003).

Some transposons such as Tn7 in Escherichia coli (Peters & Craig, 2000) and Tn917 in Bacillus subtilis (Shi, et al., 2009), Enterococcus faecalis (Garsin, et al., 2004) and Streptococcus equi (but not in Listeria monocytogenes or Streptococcus suis) (Slater, et al., 2003) also show a preference for integration into the replication terminus region and sites of DNA breakage may also attract insertions (Peters & Craig, 2000). Interestingly, an analysis of incorporation of "self-DNA" by a CRISPR system in E. coli showed a preference for trapping DNA from the terminus region of the chromosome (Levy, et al., 2015), mimicking the target preference of Tn7. It remains to be seen whether any IS has adopted these types of target preference.

In addition, IS21, IS30 and IS911 have all been observed to insert close to sequences which resemble their own IR (Reimmann & Haas, 1987, Prere, et al., 1990, Olasz, et al., 1997, Loot, et al., 2004). Although these IS are members of different families, they have in common the formation of a dsDNA excised circular transposon intermediate with abutted left and right ends (Chandler, et al., 2015). Insertion next to a resident "target" IR such that IR of the IS are abutted "head-to-head" presumably reflects the capacity of the Tpase to form a synaptic complex between one IR present in the transposon circle and the target IR. This type of structure is extremely active in transposition and will continue to generate genome rearrangements.

These examples represent only a small part of the literature concerning factors influencing target choice but serve to illustrate the impact this can have on genomes.

References :

• Brochet M, Da Cunha V, Couve E, Rusniok C, Trieu-Cuot P & Glaser P (2009) Atypical association of DDE transposition with conjugation specifies a new family of mobile elements. Mol Microbiol 71: 948-959.
• Chandler M, Fayet O, Rousseau P, Ton Hoang B & Duval-Valentin G (2015) Copy-out-Paste-in Transposition of IS911: A Major Transposition Pathway. Microbiol Spectr 3.
• Clement J-M, Wilde C, Bachellier S, Lambert P & Hofnung M (1999) IS1397 Is Active for Transposition into the Chromosome of Escherichia coli K-12 and Inserts Specifically into Palindromic Units of Bacterial Interspersed Mosaic Elements. J. Bacteriol. 181: 6929-6936.
• Craig NL (2002) Tn7. Mobile DNA, Vol. II (Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M & Lambowitz A, eds.), pp. 423-456. ASM press, Washington DC.
• Feng X & Colloms SD (2007) In vitro transposition of ISY100, a bacterial insertion sequence belonging to the Tc1/mariner family. Mol Microbiol 65: 1432-1443.
• Galas DJ, Calos MP & Miller JH (1980) Sequence analysis of Tn9 insertions in the lacZ gene. J.Mol.Biol. 144: 19-41.
• Garsin DA, Urbach J, Huguet-Tapia JC, Peters JE & Ausubel FM (2004) Construction of an Enterococcus faecalis Tn917-mediated-gene-disruption library offers insight into Tn917 insertion patterns. J Bacteriol 186: 7280-7289.
• Guerillot R, Da Cunha V, Sauvage E, Bouchier C & Glaser P (2013) Modular evolution of TnGBSs, a new family of integrative and conjugative elements associating insertion sequence transposition, plasmid replication, and conjugation for their spreading. J Bacteriol 195: 1979-1990.
• Guynet C, Achard A, Hoang BT, Barabas O, Hickman AB, Dyda F & Chandler M (2009) Resetting the site: redirecting integration of an insertion sequence in a predictable way. Mol Cell 34: 612-619.
• Hallet B, Rezsohazy R & Delcour J (1991) IS231A from Bacillus thuringiensis is functional in Escherichia coli: transposition and insertion specificity. J Bacteriol. 173: 4526-4529.
• Haniford DB & Ellis MJ (2015) Transposons Tn10 and Tn5. Microbiol Spectr 3: MDNA3-0002-2014.
• He S, Corneloup A, Guynet C, et al. (2015) The IS200/IS605 Family and "Peel and Paste" Single-strand Transposition Mechanism. Microbiol Spectr 3.
• Hu WY & Derbyshire KM (1998) Target choice and orientation preference of the insertion sequence IS903. J Bacteriol 180: 3039-3048.
• Levy A, Goren MG, Yosef I, et al. (2015) CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA. Nature 520: 505-510.
• Loot C, Turlan C & Chandler M (2004) Host processing of branched DNA intermediates is involved in targeted transposition of IS911. Mol Microbiol 51: 385-393.
• Mendiola MV & de la Cruz F (1989) Specificity of insertion of IS91, an insertion sequence present in alpha-haemolysin plasmids of Escherichia coli. Mol.Microbiol. 3: 979-984.
• Meyer J, Iida S & Arber W (1980) Does the insertion element IS1 transpose preferentially into A+T- rich DNA segments? Mol.Gen.Genet. 178: 471-473.
• Olasz F, Farkas T, Kiss J, Arini A & Arber W (1997) Terminal inverted repeats of insertion sequence IS30 serve as targets for transposition. J.Bacteriol. 179: 7551-7558.
• Parks AR, Li Z, Shi Q, Owens RM, Jin MM & Peters JE (2009) Transposition into replicating DNA occurs through interaction with the processivity factor. Cell 138: 685-695.
• Partridge SR & Hall RM (2003) The IS1111 family members IS4321 and IS5075 have subterminal inverted repeats and target the terminal inverted repeats of Tn21 family transposons. J Bacteriol 185: 6371-6384.
• Peters JE & Craig NL (2000) Tn7 transposes proximal to DNA double-strand breaks and into regions where chromosomal DNA replication terminates. Mol.Cell 6: 573-582.
• Peters JE & Craig NL (2001) Tn7: smarter than we thought. Nat.Rev.Mol.Cell Biol. 2: 806-814.
• Plasterk RH (1996) The Tc1/mariner transposon family. Curr.Top.Microbiol.Immunol. 204: 125-143.
• Post V & Hall RM (2009) Insertion sequences in the IS1111 family that target the attC recombination sites of integron-associated gene cassettes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 290: 182-187.
• Prere MF, Chandler M & Fayet O (1990) Transposition in Shigella dysenteriae: isolation and analysis of IS911, a new member of the IS3 group of insertion sequences. J Bacteriol 172: 4090-4099.
• Qi X, Daily K, Nguyen K, et al. (2012) Retrotransposon profiling of RNA polymerase III initiation sites. Genome Res 22: 681-692.
• Reimmann C & Haas D (1987) Mode of replicon fusion mediated by the duplicated insertion sequence IS21 in Escherichia coli. Genetics 115: 619-625.
• Sengstag C, Iida S, Hiestand-Nauer R & Arber W (1986) Terminal inverted repeats of prokaryotic transposable element IS186 which can generate duplications of variable length at an identical target sequence. Gene 49: 153-156.
• Shi Q, Huguet-Tapia JC & Peters JE (2009) Tn917 Targets the Region Where DNA Replication Terminates in Bacillus subtilis, Highlighting a Difference in Chromosome Processing in the Firmicutes. J Bacteriol 191: 7623-7627.
• Slater JD, Allen AG, May JP, Bolitho S, Lindsay H & Maskell DJ (2003) Mutagenesis of Streptococcus equi and Streptococcus suis by transposon Tn917. Veterinary Microbiology 93: 197-206.
• Spradling AC, Bellen HJ & Hoskins RA (2011) Drosophila P elements preferentially transpose to replication origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 15948-15953.
• Swingle B, O'Carroll M, Haniford D & Derbyshire KM (2004) The effect of host-encoded nucleoid proteins on transposition: H-NS influences targeting of both IS903 and Tn10. Mol Microbiol 52: 1055-1067.
• Tellier M, Bouuaert CC & Chalmers R (2015) Mariner and the ITm Superfamily of Transposons. Microbiol Spectr 3: MDNA3-0033-2014.
• Tetu SG & Holmes AJ (2008) A Family of Insertion Sequences That Impacts Integrons by Specific Targeting of Gene Cassette Recombination Sites, the IS1111-attC Group. J. Bacteriol. 190: 4959-4970.
• Tobes R & Pareja E (2006) Bacterial repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences are DNA targets for Insertion Sequence elements. BMC Genomics 7: 62.
• Ton-Hoang B, Pasternak C, Siguier P, et al. (2010) Single-stranded DNA transposition is coupled to host replication. Cell 142: 398-408.
• Wilde C, Escartin F, Kokeguchi S, Latour-Lambert P, Lectard A & Clement JM (2003) Transposases are responsible for the target specificity of IS1397 and ISKpn1 for two different types of palindromic units (PUs). Nucleic Acids Res 31: 4345-4353.