General features and properties of insertion sequence elements


Previous ...

Non-autonomous IS derivatives.

Many prokaryotic genomes are littered with IS fragments and small, non-autonomous IS derivatives whose transposition can, in principal, be catalyzed in trans by the Tpase of a related complete IS (Fig 1.13.1). Structures called MITEs (Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Elements) (Feschotte, et al., 2002) are related to IS with DDE Tpases (Brugger, et al., 2002, Filee, et al., 2007). Among those derived from IS with DDE transposases, representatives of the IS1, IS4, IS5, IS6, and even Tn3 family members such as ISRf1 from Sinorhizobium fredii have been identified. They are generally less than 300 bp long, include appropriately oriented left and right terminal IR but no Tpase and generally generate flanking DR. MITEs are probably derived from IS by internal deletion. Some carry short non-coding sequences between these IRs which may or may not be IS-derived. MITEs are considered to be non-autonomous transposable elements mobilisable in trans by Tpases of full-length parental genomic copies. They were first identified in plants (Feschotte, et al., 2002, Zhang, et al., 2004, Feschotte, et al., 2005, Yang, et al., 2007) and are related to Tc/mariner elements (distantly related to bacterial IS630 family). IS630-related MITEs were also the first described bacterial examples (Correia, et al., 1988, Oggioni & Claverys, 1999, Buisine, et al., 2002). MITEs showing similarities to other IS families are observed in bacteria and archaea.

MITE-like structures related to elements with other types of transposase have also been identified. Among these are IS200/IS605 family derivatives (Filee, et al., 2007);(Siguier unpublished) (Fig 1.18.1) now called PATEs (Palindrome-associated Transposable Elements) (Dyall-Smith, et al., 2011) reflecting the sub-terminal secondary structures which constitute the ends of these IS. Although originally observed in the Archaea as derivatives of known IS200/IS605 family members, they have also been observed in certain cyanobacteria and Salmonella (Siguier unpublished). They presumably represent decay products which appear quite frequently for this IS family.

Full-length copies of the parental IS may not be available or may be so divergent as to escape detection in standard BLAST analysis. This is the case for certain MITEs from the archaea (Brugger, et al., 2002) and is probably also true for the bacteria. Their detection and analysis is therefore arduous.

Another group of IS derivatives related to MITEs are called MICs (Mobile Insertion Cassette) (Chen, et al., 1999) (Fig 1.13.1). These, like MITEs, are flanked by IR, do not include a Tpase gene and generate flanking DR. They carry various coding sequences, and are present in relatively low copy number. The IS231 sub-group of the large IS4 family includes examples of many of these IS-derivatives (canonical ISs, MITEs, MICs and tIS) (De Palmenaer, et al., 2004).

    References :
  • Brugger K, Redder P, She Q, Confalonieri F, Zivanovic Y & Garrett RA (2002) Mobile elements in archaeal genomes. FEMS Microbiol.Lett. 206: 131-141.
  • Buisine N, Tang CM & Chalmers R (2002) Transposon-like Correia elements: structure, distribution and genetic exchange between pathogenic Neisseria sp. FEBS Lett 522: 52-58.
  • Chen Y, Braathen P, Léonard C & Mahillon J (1999) MIC231, a naturally occurring mobile insertion cassette from Bacillus cereus. Mol Microbiol 32: 657-668.
  • Correia FF, Inouye S & Inouye M (1988) A family of small repeated elements with some transposon-like properties in the genome of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Biol Chem 263: 12194-12198.
  • De Palmenaer D, Vermeiren C & Mahillon J (2004) IS231-MIC231 elements from Bacillus cereus sensu lato are modular. Mol Microbiol 53: 457-467.
  • Dyall-Smith ML, Pfeiffer F, Klee K, et al. (2011) Haloquadratum walsbyi: Limited Diversity in a Global Pond. PLoS ONE 6: e20968.
  • Feschotte C, Zhang X & Wessler S (2002) Miniature inverted repeat transposable elements and their relationship to established DNA transposons. Mobile DNA, Vol. II (Craig NL, Craigie R, Gellert M & Lambowitz A, eds.), pp. 1147-1158. ASM press, Washington DC.
  • Feschotte C, Osterlund MT, Peeler R & Wessler SR (2005) DNA-binding specificity of rice mariner-like transposases and interactions with Stowaway MITEs. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2153-2165.
  • Filee J, Siguier P & Chandler M (2007) Insertion sequence diversity in archaea. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 121-157.
  • Oggioni MR & Claverys JP (1999) Repeated extragenic sequences in prokaryotic genomes: a proposal for the origin and dynamics of the RUP element in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microbiology 145 ( Pt 10): 2647-2653.
  • Yang G, Zhang F, Hancock CN & Wessler SR (2007) Transposition of the rice miniature inverted repeat transposable element mPing in Arabidopsis thaliana 10.1073/pnas.0702080104. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 10962-10967.
  • Zhang X, Jiang N, Feschotte C & Wessler SR (2004) PIF- and Pong-like transposable elements: distribution, evolution and relationship with Tourist-like miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements. Genetics 166: 971-986.